Path: utzoo!censor!geac!torsqnt!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!know!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!rex!uflorida!gatech!ukma!usenet.ins.cwru.edu!news
From: drz@po.cwru.edu (Dave Zinkin)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.apps
Subject: Re: MultiFinder 6.1b9
Message-ID: <1990Nov13.170429.10815@usenet.ins.cwru.edu>
Date: 13 Nov 90 17:04:29 GMT
References: <1730@blackbird.afit.af.mil> <1990Nov13.000937.4972@hoss.unl.edu>
Sender: news@usenet.ins.cwru.edu
Organization: Case Western Reserve Univ. (Student)
Lines: 26
Nntp-Posting-Host: b63111.student.cwru.edu

In article <1990Nov13.000937.4972@hoss.unl.edu> ho@hoss.unl.edu (Tiny
Bubbles...) writes:

>(6.1b7 was apparently a MF supplied with some other product -- a beta test
>version -- and since its modification date was older than the one that came
>with 6.0.7, the Installer replaced it.  If I got that wrong, send flames.)

MF 6.1b7 was -- if I remember correctly -- supplied with Apple's debugging
environment (SADE).  There was a compatibility problem somewhere along the line
and 6.1b7 was replaced with 6.1b9.  

>What happens if these Mac users had backup copies of their beta-MF's and put
>them back in the System Folder?  Would that give "Set Aside" back, or does
>6.0.7 not work with older MF's?

I've been running MultiFinder 6.1b9 with System 6.0.7 for some time now and
have had *no* problems.  If anything, MF 6.1b9 is more stable than the "real"
versions of MultiFinder.

>        ... Michael Ho, University of Nebraska
>Internet: ho@hoss.unl.edu | "Mine... is the last voice that you will ever
hear."
>

 **-----> Dave Zinkin