Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!crdgw1!rpi!mts.rpi.edu!Garance_Drosehn
From: Garance_Drosehn@mts.rpi.edu (Garance Drosehn)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: Not another NeXT defector???!!!
Message-ID: <8Q^^8^%@rpi.edu>
Date: 12 Nov 90 00:10:28 GMT
Organization: Rensselaer Polytechnic Inst.
Lines: 16
References:<1990Nov9.195958.15383@midway.uchicago.edu> <1990Nov9.224209.18758@agate.berkeley.edu>,        <1990Nov10.015237.3468@athena.mit.edu> <QbDOnOe00UhWI1OqZr@andrew.cmu.edu>
Nntp-Posting-Host: gilead.its.rpi.edu

In article <QbDOnOe00UhWI1OqZr@andrew.cmu.edu> 
           ls1i+@andrew.cmu.edu (Leonard John Schultz) writes:
> Oh, Oh, how can you say this and be serious?  You are saying a computer
> is a computer is a computer.  I dunno, but I can pick up an IBM
> compatable $250.
> 
> You CANNOT compare minimal Macs and NeXTs when the minimal NeXT is far
> better than the maximal Mac.  Do you understand this point?

If your bank account reads $2000, then you *will* compare the minimal Mac 
with a minimal NeXT.  And the minimal NeXT is guareeteed to lose.  If you 
don't have the money for the machine, you can't buy it.

Unless you're the government...

Garance_Drosehn@mts.rpi.edu