Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!yale!mintaka!think.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!udel!rochester!pt.cs.cmu.edu!o.gp.cs.cmu.edu!andrew.cmu.edu!dd26+ From: dd26+@andrew.cmu.edu (Douglas F. DeJulio) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next Subject: Re: SLIP Message-ID: Date: 15 Nov 90 20:59:06 GMT References: <1635@camex.COM> <1990Nov13.140336.10181@sctc.com> <11081@pt.cs.cmu.edu> <1017@toaster.SFSU.EDU> , Organization: Chemistry, Carnegie Mellon, Pittsburgh, PA Lines: 14 In-Reply-To: bob@MorningStar.Com (Bob Sutterfield) writes: > Nobody should bother putting the effort into a new SLIP port these > days, but rather should concentrate on a solid PPP implementation. Except, there are lots of SLIP servers available right now, and I haven't found this to be true of PPP yet. I'll have control of the software on my NeXT, but I won't have any control of the software running on the server I connect to -- I must take what is given. Personally, I'll use a PC to route until somone else gets CSLIP running on the NeXT. -- Doug DeJulio dd26@andrew.cmu.edu