Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!lll-winken!cert!netnews.upenn.edu!msuinfo!frith!conklin
From: conklin@frith.uucp (Terry Conklin)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: RLL and ESIX
Summary: ESIX, RLL, Fast File System. Best performance, let alone price
Keywords: RLL, FFS, etc.
Message-ID: <1990Nov12.221919.11757@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu>
Date: 12 Nov 90 22:19:19 GMT
Sender: news@msuinfo.cl.msu.edu
Organization: Michigan State University, East Lansing
Lines: 28


I have run my ESIX system on an RLL controller (DTK) with a 65-meg
Micropolis drive (just big enough to hold the O.S. ;-)) It's in constant
use with currently around 4-5 users. I have the entire drive formatted
FFS.
 
The performance I get out of this setup is outstanding. With just a
stupid 386/20 and the 65M drive, all 5 users see instant response. 
Fgrepping /etc  or /bin is that fast. I'm exceedingly pleased with it
and the combined load of C development, nethackers and X-windows keeps
it earning it's keep.
 
I go on site every day to an Interactive machine, a 386/33 cached with
an 18-mil 100Meg drive. While it's Norton SI (weak, granted) is DOUBLE
my 20-mhz machine's, and it's drive twice as fast, and there's only 1 
user, it's barely as fast, and in some cases much slower.
 
As far as my use has seen, Interactive's fast file system is an
oxymoron. ESIX rev D has really sped things up a LOT.  
 
I am not so excited about the opportunities that lay ahead when I switch
to a Adaptec 1542B w/750M Micropolis drives (especially since I want
them running sync mode) but who knows. I can hope.

Terry Conklin
conklin@egr.msu.edu
uunet!frith!conklin
The Club 517-372-3131 2400 Mnp5