Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!vax1.cc.lehigh.edu!cert.sei.cmu.edu!krvw
From: GMS@PSUVM.PSU.EDU (Gerry Santoro - CAC/PSU 814-863-4356)
Newsgroups: comp.virus
Subject: SAM vs. Disinfectant (Mac)
Message-ID: <0020.9011141856.AA23262@ubu.cert.sei.cmu.edu>
Date: 14 Nov 90 16:24:00 GMT
Sender: Virus Discussion List <VIRUS-L@LEHIIBM1>
Lines: 14
Approved: krvw@sei.cmu.edu

There is currently disagreement among our macintosh users regarding
whether one should (for maximum protection) acquire SAM or
Disinfectant.  Up front I recognize that Disinfectant is free (in fact
I have version 2.3 on my Cx) and SAM is commercial.  Can anyone offer
me any stronger arguments one way or the other?  Since the Digest is
probably not the best place to argue the ralative merits of competing
packages direct email would probably be best.

thanks!
-
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------------
|   |        gerry santoro, ph.d.  --  center for academic computing      |   |
| -(*)-  penn state university -- gms@psuvm.psu.edu -- gms@psuvm.bitnet -(*)- |
|   |             standard disclaimer -->  "I yam what I yam"             |   |