Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!nih-csl!helix.nih.gov!gooey
From: gooey@helix.nih.gov (Sean Graham)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Which graphics-adapter is best?`
Message-ID: <615@nih-csl.nih.gov>
Date: 13 Nov 90 14:23:42 GMT
References: <90315.094056MUHRTH@DB0TUI11.BITNET> <1511@frapper.nsc.com>
Sender: news@nih-csl.nih.gov
Organization: National Institutes of Health, Bethesda
Lines: 22

In article <1511@frapper.nsc.com> my@frapper.UUCP (Michael Yip) writes:
>I heard that the NEC Graphics Engine is very good and fast.
>I used the Video-7 1024i and VRAM card and I wasn't impressd.
>
>-- Mike
>   my@dtg.nsc.com


	The NEC Multisync Graphics Engine is an excellent card.  In
all the reviews I've seen it's come out as one of the most
recommended.  The only other card that I've seen that will come close
to it in terms of raw speed is the Renaissance GRX Card.

	BTW, if anyone is interested in picking one up very cheap,
reply via email.  It's the 1MB version.

Sean 
--
|| Sean N. Graham                                     BIX: sean.graham      ||
|| National Institutes of Health                      gooey@helix.nih.gov   ||
||  "This is a test of the Emergency Broadcasting System.  This is just a   ||
||  test.  In the event of a real emergency you would most likely be dead." ||