Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!apple!agate!web-1e!c60c-3fz
From: c60c-3fz@web-1e.berkeley.edu (In Sik Rhee)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: Which graphics-adapter is best?`
Message-ID: <1990Nov14.225023.3672@agate.berkeley.edu>
Date: 14 Nov 90 22:50:23 GMT
References: <1511@frapper.nsc.com> <1990Nov14.030313.16366@watserv1.waterloo.edu> <1519@berlioz.nsc.com>
Sender: usenet@agate.berkeley.edu (USENET Administrator)
Distribution: usa, na
Organization: University of California, Berkeley
Lines: 12

In article <1519@berlioz.nsc.com> my@berlioz.UUCP (Michael Yip) writes:
>Well, I heard that the NEC Graphics Engine is very fast.
>
....
>Anyhow, the NEC Graphics Engine is a good card, but I would 
>probably buy the Hercule one just to support the American 
>inductrial.  ;)
>

Also, the Hercules Graphics Station Card blows away the competition when
you start talking price vs. performance...  it out-performs the NEC
by far, for less cost (and is more upgradable, etc etc)