Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mit-eddie!uw-beaver!sumax!polari!crad
From: crad@polari.UUCP (Charles Radley)
Newsgroups: sci.space
Subject: Re: Space Station mission
Message-ID: <2699@polari.UUCP>
Date: 10 Nov 90 18:55:23 GMT
References: <9011072124.AA13810@iti.org> <2688@polari.UUCP> <11042@pt.cs.cmu.edu>
Organization: Seattle Online Public Unix (206) 328-4944
Lines: 9


 
+I think you have just destroyed your argument that LLNL will wind
+up as expensive as Freedom. LLNL won't loft the science equipment.
+This is smart: the alternative is no space station, and then there
+_really_ won't be any science done.
-
What is smart about not lanching any science equipment ?
How can you get science out of a station with no equipment ?