Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!wuarchive!emory!hubcap!ncrcae!ncrlnk!ncr-mpd!Mike.McManus From: Mike.McManus@FtCollins.NCR.com (Mike McManus) Newsgroups: sci.space Subject: Re: Space Station Work Package #3 Message-ID: Date: 13 Nov 90 21:13:43 GMT References: <90311.130321GWS102@psuvm.psu.edu> <9011072137.AA15699@iti.org> Sender: uucp@ncr-mpd.FtCollins.NCR.COM Organization: NCR Microelectronic Products, Ft. Collins, CO Lines: 21 In-reply-to: aws@ITI.ORG's message of 7 Nov 90 21:37:17 GMT In article <9011072137.AA15699@iti.org> aws@ITI.ORG ("Allen W. Sherzer") writes: > As a result of the 91 appropriation, NASA is to redesign the station in > 90 days. This redesign is to provide a modular incrimentally growable ^^^^^^^^ > design buildable within more reasonable budget numbers. They are also to > assume reasonable launch numbers for the Shuttle and make better use of > cheaper expendables. Ackkk! What exactly constitutes a "redesign"? New concept? Partial rework? Total rework from top to bottom? Detailed engineering? Given the pace at which things have gone up to now, what can be done for SSF in 90 days? -- Disclaimer: All spelling and/or grammar in this document are guaranteed to be correct; any exseptions is the is wurk uv intter-net deemuns,. Mike McManus Mike.McManus@FtCollins.NCR.COM, or NCR Microelectronics ncr-mpd!mikemc@ncr-sd.sandiego.ncr.com, or 2001 Danfield Ct. uunet!ncrlnk!ncr-mpd!garage!mikemc Ft. Collins, Colorado (303) 223-5100 Ext. 378