Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!news.cs.indiana.edu!uceng!minerva!dmocsny From: dmocsny@minerva.che.uc.edu (Daniel Mocsny) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: Costs of High-resolution graphical displays Message-ID: <6737@uceng.UC.EDU> Date: 18 Nov 90 06:23:30 GMT References: <6726@uceng.UC.EDU> <11137@pt.cs.cmu.edu> Sender: news@uceng.UC.EDU Organization: University of Cincinnati, Cin'ti., OH Lines: 33 In article <11137@pt.cs.cmu.edu> lindsay@gandalf.cs.cmu.edu (Donald Lindsay) writes: >That doesn't mean that we're stuck, that means that it's time for >another change. One possibility is liquid crystal. Some researchers >are doing color via LC shutters over grayscale CRTs; this eliminates >the fabrication/resolution issues of a color CRT's color mask. Some >researchers use a small LC image, and use optics to make a large >projection of it. There are fun projects writing luminous dots with >lasers; the plasma panel people haven't given up; and in general >there are a zoo of experiments and hopes that could still make it. In >summary, I'm optimistic. All the labs know how valuable the right >patent could be: they are spending the money to search for it. I'd like to see a genetically-engineered animal with pixel-addressible skin pigment cells. We could start with an animal such as a squid or flatfish that already adjusts it pigmentation at will to camouflage itself. We could probably goose one of those babies up to run X-window. Then display size would be limited only by the size of the aquarium. It would be portable, provided you liked swimming. And best of all, it would be touch sensitive. I can see the project meeting already: "What do you mean, the code is late because a sperm whale ate your display?!?" -- Dan Mocsny Snail: Internet: dmocsny@minerva.che.uc.edu Dept. of Chemical Engng. M.L. 171 dmocsny@uceng.uc.edu University of Cincinnati 513/751-6824 (home) 513/556-2007 (lab) Cincinnati, Ohio 45221-0171