Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!uflorida!haven!mimsy!mojo!SYSMGR@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU
From: sysmgr@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU (Doug Mohney)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Top Ten Computer Architectures (was Re: UNIX)
Message-ID: <0093FFDB.70843660@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU>
Date: 20 Nov 90 15:32:32 GMT
References: <11613@alice.att.com> <4868@trantor.harris-atd.com> <4876@trantor.harris-atd.com>,<1990Nov19.123415.22488@hq.demos.su>
Sender: news@eng.umd.edu (The News System)
Reply-To: sysmgr@KING.ENG.UMD.EDU (Doug Mohney)
Organization: The U. of MD, CP, CAD lab
Lines: 18

In article <1990Nov19.123415.22488@hq.demos.su>, bil@hq.demos.su (Igor' Bel'chinskiy) writes:
>
>If you compare computer architectures from commercial success point of view
>than you skip electronic watches and HP calculators. :-)
>
>If you compare computer architectures from flames' density per
>instruction set point of view
>than uncoditionally SYSTEM/360 must be second - next after
>Intel 80x86 line. (sorry, no ':-)')
>
>IMHO, better define criteria at first.
>						Igor.

Maybe we could do the Top 10 cloned-architectures in Eastern Europe? :-)

Doug Mohney, Operations Manager, CAD Lab/ME, Univ. of Maryland College Park
*    Why do VMS system managers get more sleep and less ulcers than their  *
*        UNIX(TM) counterparts, despite the sophistication of UNIX?        *