Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!bu.edu!nucsrl!telecom-request From: stables!sw@indetech.com (Steve Warner) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Telemarketing Sleezoids Message-ID: <68864@bu.edu.bu.edu> Date: 14 Nov 90 17:17:19 GMT Sender: news@bu.edu.bu.edu Organization: TELECOM Digest Lines: 60 Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 10, Issue 825, Message 7 of 11 Tonight I received the first telemarketing call in some months. The call went something like this... Me: Hello? TMS (Telemarket Slease): Is Jane Frazzlebottom there? Me: Sorry - there is no one here by THAT name! TMS: Is John Frazzlebottom there then.. This is AT(&)(N)T Calling... Me: No - No one here by that name either, sorry. TMS: Did I call the correct number (415) nXX-xxxx? Me: Yes that is my number now TMS: Oh - you must have had the number only a short while then. Me: (catching on to this crap) What company did you say you are with??? TMS: AT(&)(N)T. [sounded like AT&T but was slurred very expertly] Me: Did you say AT [AND] T or AT [N] T. TMS: AT [N] T. Me: You guys are a joke. Click. This was obviously going to degrade into some sort of push to switch to their brand of rotten LD service. And if I hadn't seen someone HERE mention that someone was using ATNT as a company name - I may have fallen for it too. The line they called me on is one of three, which I changed numbers to, in order to get PAC*BELL message center. Previously my lines were on a new prefix which never got telemarketing. As soon as I hung up, it rang again - annoyed I answered, thinking it was ATNT again - the caller asked if my paper was arriving ok, this is the {San Jose Mercury News} calling. (This REALLY happened.) Time to change that number BACK to the orginal prefix! Steve Warner fremont, ca, USA etc replys to: sun!indetech!stables!sw [Moderator's Note: A story in TELECOM Digest in 1988 told about a fellow here in Chicago who had incorporated his business using the name "The Phone Company". He was selling an insurance policy dealing with phone repair/replacements as needed, just like Illinois Bell with their 'Line Backer' service. The Illinois Consumer Protection Office made him stop. I feel rather certain ATNT is so close in sound to AT and T that when Mother finds out about his scheme he'll get sued and be forced at the least to change his name to something not infringing on theirs. PAT]