Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uflorida!gatech!mcnc!rti!dg-rtp!dg-rtp.dg.com!goudreau
From: goudreau@dg-rtp.dg.com (Bob Goudreau)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Rationale for my posting draft V7 C description
Message-ID: <1990Nov20.173322.18533@dg-rtp.dg.com>
Date: 20 Nov 90 17:33:22 GMT
References: <2713@lupine.NCD.COM> <19347:Nov1608:11:3390@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <1990Nov17.004557.14642@dg-rtp.dg.com> <9770:Nov2004:40:4490@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>
Sender: usenet@dg-rtp.dg.com (Usenet Administration)
Reply-To: goudreau@dg-rtp.dg.com (Bob Goudreau)
Organization: Data General Corporation, Research Triangle Park, NC
Lines: 29

In article <9770:Nov2004:40:4490@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>,
brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein) writes:
> 
> > No.  He was talking about the cross-posting of this discussion to
> > comp.std.c, which certainly *is* dedicated to ANSI C.   You did
notice
> > that the original guy had listed comp.std.c as well as comp.lang.c
> > in his "Newsgroups" line, didn't you?
> 
> No, I didn't. If Ron hadn't thought that his comments were
appropriate
> for comp.lang.c, why would he have set followups to this group?

Geez, that was exactly the point:  to move the discussion *out* of
comp.std.c (where it didn't belong) and into comp.lang.c (where it
is appropriate).


> There's no reason I should have looked at the original newsgroups.

There's no excuse for not paying attention to *all* the contents
of an article, including its header.

----------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Goudreau				+1 919 248 6231
Data General Corporation
62 Alexander Drive			goudreau@dg-rtp.dg.com
Research Triangle Park, NC  27709	...!mcnc!rti!xyzzy!goudreau
USA