Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!kibo
From: kibo@pawl.rpi.edu (James 'Kibo' Parry)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.postscript
Subject: Re: Question about UniqueID values for user-defined fonts.
Message-ID: <{B|^4Y+@rpi.edu>
Date: 20 Nov 90 05:56:55 GMT
References: <1090@applix.com> <1990Nov19.180259.2099@cl.cam.ac.uk>
Organization: The Wacky World of Kibology.  Only in Schenectady.
Lines: 15
Nntp-Posting-Host: pawl19.pawl.rpi.edu

In article <1990Nov19.180259.2099@cl.cam.ac.uk> cet1@cl.cam.ac.uk (C.E. Thompson) writes:
>I don't think that your exegesis can be supported by the text. The range
>is 0 to 16777215 for each FontType, separately. That is, fonts with different
>FontType need not have different UniqueID in order for font cache integrity
>to be maintained.

Whew!  I can finally stop worrying about what will happen when I add
those 9 million fonts to my printer.

:-)
-- 
james "kibo" parry, 138 birch lane, scotia, ny 12302 <-- close to schenectady.
kibo@rpi.edu                /  Kibology   /   All colors    /  Kibo is no
userfe0n@rpitsmts.bitnet   /  is better! /  are arbitrary. / ordinary bozo.
Anything I say is my own opinion, which is always the opposite of Xibo's.