Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!src.honeywell.com!msi.umn.edu!cs.umn.edu!dmshq!com50!craig
From: craig@com50.c2s.mn.org (Craig Wilson)
Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: Re: Fool
Message-ID: <1990Nov21.031701.18701@com50.c2s.mn.org>
Date: 21 Nov 90 03:17:01 GMT
References: <18667@rpp386.cactus.org> <1990Nov2.191240.4568@lavaca.uh.edu> <18684@rpp386.cactus.org> <1990Nov3.193714.4223@lavaca.uh.edu> <1990Nov4.031734.19127@com50.c2s.mn.org> <284@crucible.UUCP> <1990Nov6.030346.11113@com50.c2s.mn.org> <288@crucible.UUCP> <1990No
Organization: Com Squared Systems, Inc.
Lines: 13

In article <8313@gollum.twg.com> david@twg.com (David S. Herron) writes:
>In article I write:
>>With respect to authority, there IS some authority in the guidelines and the
>>adherence most sites give to them.

>The fortunate thing about what authority there is, is that it was
>mutually agreed to & debated/fought-over in public & was (in all
>ways) a Community Decision.  Those who were interested enough
>partook, those who weren't have to live with the results.

This sounds suspiciously like some democracies I know.

/craig