Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!wuarchive!emory!gatech!mcnc!uvaarpa!murdoch!astsun.astro.Virginia.EDU!gsh7w
From: gsh7w@astsun.astro.Virginia.EDU (Greg Hennessy)
Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: Re: CNN
Message-ID: <1990Nov20.145849.2564@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU>
Date: 20 Nov 90 14:58:49 GMT
References: <4948@rsiatl.UUCP> <5378@prussian9.UUCP> <5012@rsiatl.UUCP>
Sender: news@murdoch.acc.Virginia.EDU
Organization: University of Virginia
Lines: 20

John DeArmond writes:

#I'd have figured it would have been CNN that would
#come up with a case bad enough to have the court break its no-prior-restraint
#policy.  Teddy's done it again.

I would suspect that the reason for the change in attitude has more to
do with whom Reagan and Bush have appointed to the supreme court,
rather than any actions of Mr. Kennedy.

Mike, do you know the vote distribution of the current CNN injunction
ruling, and the distribution on the Pentagon Papers ruling? All I
heard on the CNN  ruling was that it was 7-2, but I don't know who
voted which way.

--
-Greg Hennessy, University of Virginia
 USPS Mail:     Astronomy Department, Charlottesville, VA 22903-2475 USA
 Internet:      gsh7w@virginia.edu  
 UUCP:		...!uunet!virginia!gsh7w