Xref: utzoo comp.mail.uucp:5496 comp.sources.d:5971 comp.unix.questions:27057 news.sysadmin:3389
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!usc!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!tuvie!iiasa!wnp
From: wnp@iiasa.ac.at (wolf paul)
Newsgroups: comp.mail.uucp,comp.sources.d,comp.unix.questions,news.sysadmin
Subject: Rich $alz is still alive ??!!!??!! (Was: Re: What should a new UUCP protocol do?)
Summary: So where is c.s.u. traffic?
Message-ID: <964@iiasa.UUCP>
Date: 20 Nov 90 16:49:34 GMT
References: <+2m8g2.lb1@smurf.sub.org> <1898.273bd977@dcs.simpact.com> <2992@litchi.bbn.com>
Sender: news@iiasa.AT
Reply-To: wnp%iiasa@relay.eu.net (wolf paul)
Organization: International Institute for Applied Systems Analysis, Laxenburg, Austria
Lines: 24

In article <2992@litchi.bbn.com> rsalz@bbn.com (Rich Salz) writes:
>three years ago (ahh, for the days when pyramid!csg would email me the
>latest Pyramid UUCP for the asking... :-)
>	/r$

ahh, for the days when there was a reasonably fast turnaround in 
comp.sources.unix .... but things change, don't they?

>-- 
>Please send comp.sources.unix-related mail to rsalz@uunet.uu.net.
>Use a domain-based address or give alternate paths, or you may lose out.
                                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
							I find it hard
to believe that all recent submissions to c.s.u. had invalid bang-path
addresses; yet they (and all of us) still lose out because there is 
nothing appearing in c.s.u. So what difference does a domain-based
address make?


--
W.N.Paul, Int. Institute f. Applied Systems Analysis, A-2361 Laxenburg--Austria
PHONE: +43-2236-71521-465            INTERNET: wnp%iiasa@relay.eu.net
FAX:   +43-2236-71313                UUCP:     uunet!iiasa!wnp
HOME:  +43-2236-618514               BITNET:   tuvie!iiasa!wnp@awiuni01.BITNET