Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga:72059 comp.sys.mac.misc:5927 comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc:3856 misc.legal:22717
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ames!uhccux!munnari.oz.au!darwin.ntu.edu.au!black_pd
From: black_pd@darwin.ntu.edu.au
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga,comp.sys.mac.misc,comp.sys.ibm.pc.misc,misc.legal
Subject: Re: Do *NOT* reveal paper clip trick...NET IMAGE & censorship
Message-ID: <1990Nov19.131251.372@darwin.ntu.edu.au>
Date: 19 Nov 90 03:42:51 GMT
References: <2653@ttardis.UUCP> <1990Nov10.063416.5731@ariel.unm.edu> <1990Nov15.112229.24716@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au>
Lines: 20

In article <1990Nov15.112229.24716@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au>, rdt155r@monu6.cc.monash.edu.au (mr  r    vanschyndel) writes:
> kchiu@triton.unm.edu writes:
> 
> In Australia, we get NO world distribution of several groups on grounds similar
> to those stated above.  They are:
> 
> 	alt.sex.*         (Maybe the sheer volume???)
> 	alt.drugs.*       (who knows?)

Strange, we get alt.drugs and six varieties of alt.sex.* up here in Darwin,
and I thought it all came through the same gateway.

> A decision was made, without NET consultation, at the Australian gateway -
> munnari.oz.au - to filter these  groups, resulting in some bitter arguments

Hmm. Maybe I should have kept my mouth shut?


Paul Black
Northern Territory University