Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!uflorida!gatech!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!hp4nl!sci.kun.nl!cs.kun.nl!rhialto From: rhialto@cs.kun.nl (Olaf Seibert) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga Subject: Re: Old AmigaLibDisk material Message-ID: <2469@wn1.sci.kun.nl> Date: 21 Nov 90 19:49:55 GMT References: <9654@jarthur.Claremont.EDU> <35991@cup.portal.com> <14089@mcdphx.phx.mcd.mot.com> Sender: root@sci.kun.nl Organization: University of Nijmegen, The Netherlands Lines: 34 In article <14089@mcdphx.phx.mcd.mot.com> fnf@riscokid.UUCP (Fred Fish) writes: >I have been tempted to start a new policy of only including material for >which source is either distributed with the material, or available from the >author, and that such source has to be provided (even if not distributed) >with any submissions. This would probably noticably cut down on the number >of future disks, but I think the overall quality would be higher. >Comments pro and con are invited... I am strongly in favour of such a policy. One of the great things of programs that include source is that if they don't work, you can fix it yourself. (Assuming you know how to program, of course.) Many times there are also small details that you would like to change. And if you changed something to suit your particular need you can reasonably say: "I wrote it, so it's better.". [Note btw that I use my own modified version of English punctuation rules here. I wrote them, so they are better. ;-)] Of course this will reduce volume, but I think that quality is more important than quantity. We don't need 20 different binary-only programs to do X; we are far better off with 5 different programs which include source. Another reason to encourage including source is that if I can choose between two similar programs, only one of which includes source, I will use the one with source. I think many other people would do the same. There may sometimes be valid reasons not to release source, but in such a case the author must establish them "beyond reasonable doubt". >-Fred -- Olaf 'Rhialto' Seibert rhialto@cs.kun.nl How can you be so stupid if you're identical to me? -Robert Silverberg