Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!samsung!munnari.oz.au!uniwa!wemmp From: wemmp@cutmcvax.cs.curtin.edu.au (Peter Wemm) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: What's Wrong with ARP!!!! Message-ID: Date: 21 Nov 90 20:55:40 GMT References: <114.273F7E66@myamiga.UUCP> <1990Nov14.034507.19784@hoss.unl.edu> < <7039@sugar.hackercorp.com>> <90318.162021DXB132@psuvm.psu.edu> <1990Nov20.045016.8678@phoenix.pub.uu.oz.au> <1990Nov21.024420.20918@cs.umn.edu> Sender: usenet@uniwa.uwa.oz (USENET News System) Organization: Curtin University of Technology, Computing Science Lines: 14 OK, That was the last straw!!!!! This argument has gone on long enough!! Into the kill file it goes! For what it is worth, If you like arp, use it! If you dont, then simple: dont! Dont try and force your ideas on others! I quite liked ARP and used it continuously since I first got it. Personally I am quite pleased that most of ARP (extended commands, filerequester etc) has gone into 2.0. All that "non-standard" stuff is becoming standard! -- Peter Wemm ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ wemmp@cutmcvax.oz.au (wemmp@cutmcvax.oz or ..!munnari!cutmcvax.oz.au!wemmp) "To understand Recursion, you need to understand Recursion." - I forgot who..