Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!mips!sgi!silvlis.com!jimb From: jimb@silvlis.com (Jim Budler) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2 Subject: Re: Do *NOT* reveal or mention "hacking" information (was Re: paper clip trick) Message-ID: <1990Nov18.041100.8224@silvlis.com> Date: 18 Nov 90 04:11:00 GMT References: <1990Nov14.225343.4867@isis.cs.du.edu> <5V*^Z|@rpi.edu> <240@anomaly.sbs.com> Sender: usenet@silvlis.com (USENET news maint) Reply-To: jimb@silvlis.com (Jim Budler) Organization: Silvar-Lisco,Inc. Sunnyvale Ca. Lines: 37 In article <240@anomaly.sbs.com> mpd@anomaly.sbs.com (Michael P. Deignan) writes: >sigma@pawl.rpi.edu (Kevin J Martin) writes: > >>Uh, excuse me, but have you *read* the license that comes with just about >>any software you buy these days? Most of them clearly state, in thick >>legalese, "You do NOT own this software, you have been given a LICENSE to >>use this software, Company X still OWNS this software, etc" and they then >>proceed to restrict just about every right they can think of. > >Uh, excuse me, but courts have ruled that "shrink wrap" licenses are not >binding... > >MD Uh, not quite... They ruled that if the license isn't visible before opening the 'final' package it wasn't valid. In case you haven't noticed all the stuff you buy today has the disks in an envelope with the license printed on the outside, or the license is included and readable before you open that last envelope. If you open the envelope today, you are bound by that license. Shrink wrap rulings don't apply once you open the envelope since the license was visible before this point and you are allowed an unconditional full refund before this point. After you open the envelope you are stuck, legally. Even in states where the shrink wrap was never tested in court this is now the practice. jim -- __ __ / o / Jim Budler jimb@silvlis.com | Proud / / /\/\ /__ Silvar-Lisco, Inc. +1.408.991.6115 | MacIIsi /__/ / / / /__/ 703 E. Evelyn Ave. Sunnyvale, Ca. 94086 | owner