Xref: utzoo comp.protocols.tcp-ip:13836 comp.sys.dec:4563 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!cica!iuvax!copper!hughes From: hughes@copper.ucs.indiana.edu (larry hughes) Newsgroups: comp.protocols.tcp-ip,comp.sys.dec Subject: Re: DECnet encapsulation in TCP-IP Message-ID: <73306@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu> Date: 20 Nov 90 22:04:28 GMT References: <90313.134117JHL1@psuvm.psu.edu> <15782@cbmvax.commodore.com> <897@fred.UUCP> Sender: news@iuvax.cs.indiana.edu Organization: Indiana University, Bloomington IN. Lines: 34 In article <897@fred.UUCP> rbraun@fred.UUCP (Richard Braun) writes: >grr@cbmvax.commodore.com (George Robbins) writes: >>In article <90313.134117JHL1@psuvm.psu.edu> JHL1@psuvm.psu.edu writes: >>> We're interested in encapsulating DECnet within a TCP-IP package. We >>> are looking primarily for a software solution... >> >>I believe TGV multinet can handle this... > >MultiNet is, IMHO, far and away the best TCP/IP package available for >VAX/VMS. (This after reviewing products ranging from Process Software >to Fusion to Wollongong to...) It's a Stanford-bred product written >in C with some TOPS-20'isms in it. > >But I fail to understand the original question: "encapsulating DECnet >within TCP/IP". That just doesn't mean anything. It could mean > [etc.] DEC used to have a product called an "internet portal" which enveloped TCP/IP within DECnet. It was a hardware/software solution consisting of an Ultrix workstation at both ends (i.e. on two networks separated by a DECnet backbone) to handle the enveloping/de-enveloping. It's quite possible that they reversed this to envelope DECnet withing TCP/IP... //=========================================================================\\ || Larry J. Hughes, Jr. || hughes@ucs.indiana.edu || || Indiana University || || || University Computing Services || "The person who knows everything || || 750 N. State Road 46 Bypass || has a lot to learn." || || Bloomington, IN 47405 || || || (812) 855-9255 || Disclaimer: Same as my quote... || \\==========================================================================//