Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!n8emr!cmhgate!f1.n354.z1.FIDONET.ORG!MARK.HOLLINGSWORTH
From: MARK.HOLLINGSWORTH@f1.n354.z1.FIDONET.ORG (MARK HOLLINGSWORTH)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.misc
Subject: Re: Do *NOT* reveal or mention "hacking"
Message-ID: <97078.27440859@cmhgate.FIDONET.ORG>
Date: 13 Nov 90 16:23:21 GMT
Sender: ufgate@cmhgate.FIDONET.ORG (newsout1.26)
Organization: FidoNet node 1:354/1 - Evergreen Micro Net, Port Angeles WA
Lines: 18

>>In article <2653@ttardis.UUCP> rlw@ttardis.UUCP (Ron Wilson) writes:
>Do *NOT* reveal, or even mention, any information on how to defeat copy
>protection.  In the eyes of the law, doing so reduces the NET to the
status
>of a pirate BBS.
 In Compuserve, at least according to the forum operators I talked to,
it is OK to disscuss means to make a back-up copy of any App.
If this means defeating copy protection...
 This of course assumes you are a registered owner-and not pirating
software.
  I may be ignorant on the laws, but is this incorrect?
 
-->  Lininger Utilities Distribution Site<--
 
--  
MARK HOLLINGSWORTH via cmhGate - Net 226 fido<=>uucp gateway Col, OH
UUCP: ...!osu-cis!n8emr!cmhgate!354!1!MARK.HOLLINGSWORTH
INET: MARK.HOLLINGSWORTH@f1.n354.z1.FIDONET.ORG