Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!sun-barr!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!asuvax!stjhmc!p12.f56.n114.z1.fidonet.org!Chris.Gehlker
From: Chris.Gehlker@p12.f56.n114.z1.fidonet.org (Chris Gehlker)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: THINK Pascal debugger (Re: THINK C Debugger)
Message-ID: <30470.274B6656@stjhmc.fidonet.org>
Date: 20 Nov 90 13:22:24 GMT
Sender: ufgate@stjhmc.fidonet.org (newsout1.26)
Organization: FidoNet node 1:114/56.12 - AZ MAC UG, Phoenix AZ
Lines: 19

siegel@endor.uucp (Rich Siegel) writes:

>         Finally, I question your assertion that THINK C makes it easier
> to write applications than THINK Pascal. Each environment presents a distinct
> set of strengths and weaknesses. I consider some of THINK C's behavior to
> be less than desirable, but I would not generalize that to mean that THINK

> Pascal is a better environment to write applications. I believe that you've
> expressed a personal opinion, and that you might have done well to explicitly
> position it as such.

I can't miss the opportunity to voice my pet peeve. I't really bugs me
that the editing keyboard shortcuts, option-up arrow etc., are different
in each environment. Seems like I'm always hitting the wrong combination
for the environment that I'm in.

--  
Uucp: ...{gatech,ames,rutgers}!ncar!asuvax!stjhmc!56.12!Chris.Gehlker
Internet: Chris.Gehlker@p12.f56.n114.z1.fidonet.org