Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sun-barr!olivea!mintaka!ogicse!cs.uoregon.edu!storm!bostrov
From: bostrov@storm.UUCP (Vareck Bostrom)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next
Subject: Re: NeXTStation Benchmarks
Message-ID: <647@storm.UUCP>
Date: 17 Nov 90 06:31:22 GMT
References: <750@kaos.MATH.UCLA.EDU>
Reply-To: bostrov@storm.UUCP (Vareck Bostrom)
Distribution: na
Organization: storm UUCP, Eugene, Oregon, United States
Lines: 18

While we're tossing up benchmark results, take a look at this:

HP 9000/220 (68010 at 10 ?? MHz)
1010 dhrys/sec	0.001 MFLOPS


Why not use a raytracer as a benchmark? They seem to have a good mix of
floating point and integer (though they are a bit heaver on fp). 

Other weird benches:

IBM PC/XT (8088 at 5 MHz)
491 dhrys/sec  <0.001 MFLOPS

IBM PC/jr (8088 at 5 MHz)
366 dhrys/sec  <0.001 MFLOPS

I haven't ever tested anything slower than a PC/jr.