Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!think.com!mintaka!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!mcsun!unido!sbsvax!wolf From: wolf@fb14vax.sbsvax.uucp (Wolfgang Huwig) Newsgroups: comp.text.tex Subject: Re: Answers to two really hard LaTeX puzzles (long) Message-ID: Date: 17 Nov 90 15:51:34 GMT References: <90Nov13.135116edt.102@smoke.cs.toronto.edu> <1990Nov14.093033.23993@irisa.fr> Sender: news@sbsvax.cs.uni-sb.de Organization: Universitaet des Saarlandes, Saarbruecken, West Germany. Lines: 16 In-reply-to: decouty@irisa.fr's message of 14 Nov 90 09:30:33 GMT In article <1990Nov14.093033.23993@irisa.fr> decouty@irisa.fr (Bertrand Decouty) writes: [...] (e) use multi! enables you to print 2/4/8/16 (if you still can read!) on a physical sheet of paper. VERY fine, and it works (with dvips, [...] But you should use it with PostScript fonts. I've used it with dvips and a laserwriter and the PS version looked quite good even 4 up whereas the version using TeX fonts already looked ugly 2up (some pixels got simply lost, e.g. the whole baseline). Anyone a solution using TeX fonts which is still looking good? (I like CM) Wolfgang --- internet: wolf@cs.uni-sb.de