Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!usc!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!ira.uka.de!ifistg!ifi!momma From: momma@is.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de (Stefan Momma) Newsgroups: comp.text.tex Subject: two-up w/ TeX fonts (was Re: Answers to two really...) Message-ID: Date: 18 Nov 90 11:29:48 GMT References: <90Nov13.135116edt.102@smoke.cs.toronto.edu> <1990Nov14.093033.23993@irisa.fr> Sender: news@ifistg.uucp Reply-To: momma@is.informatik.uni-stuttgart.de Organization: IfI, Univ. Stuttgart, W Germany Lines: 36 In-reply-to: wolf@fb14vax.sbsvax.uucp's message of 17 Nov 90 15:51:34 GMT In article wolf@fb14vax.sbsvax.uucp (Wolfgang Huwig) writes: > In article <1990Nov14.093033.23993@irisa.fr> decouty@irisa.fr > Bertrand Decouty) writes: > e) use multi! enables you to print > 2/4/8/16 (if you still can read!) on a physical sheet of paper. > VERY fine, and it works (with dvips, > But you should use it with PostScript fonts. I've used it with > dvips and a laserwriter and the PS version looked quite good even > 4 up whereas the version using TeX fonts already looked ugly 2up > some pixels got simply lost, e.g. the whole baseline). Anyone a > solution using TeX fonts which is still looking good? (I like CM) > > Wolfgang > --- > internet: wolf@cs.uni-sb.de It looks much better, if you provide TeX fonts in the proper magnifications. (I.e. something like 1/sqrt(2) times the standard ones). There was a note on this in comp.text.tex some time ago (by Don Hosek, if I remember correctly). Takes up some extra disk space, but the results are worth it (what's an extra disk, if you can save a tree's life) -- stefan -- -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. Stefan Momma voicemail:+49-711-121-1431(secret.:-3125,fax:-3141/-3500) Projekt Polygloss Internet: momma@informatik.uni-stuttgart.de IMS-CL/IfI-AIS Because-It's-There-NET: nbab1424@ds0rus54 Univ. of Stuttgart ICBMnet : 48 46 36 N; 9 10 48 E; alt 245 m Sneakernet: Keplerstr. 17, D-7000 Stuttgart 1, FRG -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-. most frequent last words: " Uh-oh !" -.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.-.