Path: utzoo!attcan!uunet!olivea!apple!altos!megadon!clp
From: cudcv@cu.warwick.ac.uk (Rob McMahon)
Newsgroups: comp.unix
Subject: Re: Summary: SCCS vs. RCS
Keywords: SCCS RCS source code control
Message-ID: <2266@megadon.UUCP>
Date: 21 Nov 90 00:01:28 GMT
References: <2252@megadon.UUCP> <2255@megadon.UUCP> <2260@megadon.UUCP>
Sender: clp@megadon.UUCP
Organization: Computing Services, Warwick University, UK
Lines: 23
Approved: clp@megadon.UUCP
Apparently-To: comp-unix@uk.ac.ukc

>On the other hand, if one uses a ``standard'' make, there is no support for a
>',' as a delimiter for suffixes, so it's rather difficult to automate use of
>RCS.

Uh ?  You don't need it.  Most of what you need can be done with rules like

.SUFFIXES:	.c,v

.c,v.c:
	$(CO) -q $*.c
.c,v.o:
	$(CO) -q $*.c
	$(CC) $(CFLAGS) -c $*.c
	$(RM) -f $*.c

... etc.  Note that for SCCS it *has* to be built into make, because it uses
prefixes instead of suffixes.

Rob
--
UUCP:   ...!mcsun!ukc!warwick!cudcv	PHONE:  +44 203 523037
JANET:  cudcv@uk.ac.warwick             INET:   cudcv@warwick.ac.uk
Rob McMahon, Computing Services, Warwick University, Coventry CV4 7AL, England