Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!bellcore!uunet!grumbly!duc
From: duc@grumbly.COM (Richard Ducoty)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.admin
Subject: Re: tar or cpio, which is better?
Message-ID: <10@grumbly.COM>
Date: 22 Nov 90 14:59:19 GMT
References: <529@comcon.UUCP> <1990Nov12.095657.22489@erbe.se> <1990Nov14.213344.23834@d.cs.okstate.edu> <1990Nov15.154616.27759@viewlogic.com> <1990Nov15.192615.1238@hemel.bull.co.uk>
Organization: Pleasure Point Night Fighters
Lines: 29

mpreen@hemel.bull.co.uk (Malcolm Preen) writes:

>sparks@power.viewlogic.com (Alan Sparks) writes:

>>In article <1990Nov12.095657.22489@erbe.se> prc@erbe.se (Robert Claeson) writes:
>>>Using cpio instead worked just fine. Also, for backup purposes,
>>>cpio is probably the best. It comes *standard* with the ability to
>>>detect end-of-tape and create multi-volume archives. 

>On our system, Bull DPX/2-300 running a mix of system V and BSD the man page
>for cpio says :
>.........
>          -I file
>               Read the contents of file as input.  If file is a
>               ...

>          -O file
>               Direct the output of cpio to file.  If file is a
>               ...
=======================================

SVR4 also includes the I,O,.. switches for multi volume cpio.  You have
to be careful using these switches if the tapes, files, etc might be
used on System V 3.2 or earlier System V machines. 


\\\
 - -   Richard Ducoty                                ..uunet!grumbly!duc
 _]    Capitola, California                            duc@grumbly.com