Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!bu.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!ucsd!nosc!crash!pnet01!jca
From: jca@pnet01.cts.com (John C. Archambeau)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: ESIX and MCA
Message-ID: <5721@crash.cts.com>
Date: 19 Nov 90 05:16:01 GMT
Sender: root@crash.cts.com
Organization: People-Net [pnet01], El Cajon CA
Lines: 32

bill@unixland.uucp (Bill Heiser) writes:
>Why don't you just using Esix and install smail in place of sendmail?  The
>sendmail problem doesn't seem like enough of a reason to slam the door shut
>on Esix.
>
>The things I've heard about Interactive and SCO do *NOT* lead me to believe
>they are all so great themselves...  It seems that ALL of the available 

It's Everex's attitude on fixing things.  I would be more than happy to go
that route if Everex would say...

"Alright, you caught it, we'll look into it and send you a fix for it as soon
as we find the problem."

Rather than...

"Yes, it's broke alright, tough (*bleep*).  You want it fixed, buy the next
version."

Or is this a false misconception on the net regarding ESIX support?  I know
SCO fixes things with their updates for free.
 
     // JCA

 /*
 **--------------------------------------------------------------------------*
 ** Flames  : /dev/null                     | Small memory model only for
 ** ARPANET : crash!pnet01!jca@nosc.mil     | Unix?  Get the (*bleep*) out
 ** INTERNET: jca@pnet01.cts.com            | of here!
 ** UUCP    : {nosc ucsd hplabs!hd-sdd}!crash!pnet01!jca
 **--------------------------------------------------------------------------*
 */