Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!chinacat!uudell!Kepler!mjhammel
From: mjhammel@Kepler.dell.com (Michael J. Hammel)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: TCP/IP under ISC
Keywords: update, TCP/IP
Message-ID: <12461@uudell.dell.com>
Date: 20 Nov 90 18:15:33 GMT
References: <12431@uudell.dell.com> <1990Nov18.173628.21839@maverick.ksu.ksu.edu>
Sender: news@uudell.dell.com
Reply-To: mjhammel@Kepler.dell.com (Michael J. Hammel)
Organization: Dell Computer Corp.
Lines: 18

In article <12431@uudell.dell.com>, mjhammel@Kepler.dell.com (Michael J.
Hammel) writes:
> compatible with other TCP/IP implementations.  Specifically, it doesn't
> seem too happy with System V.4 TCP/IP or SunOS 4.0.  Telnet's from the
> V.4 to a 1.2 system won't complete (they hang).  Rlogin's require the -8
> option in order to not get things confused when using vi.  There are
> some other things.  Basically, I've decided 1.1.2 is more compatible in
> a heterogenous network.
> 
In fairness, I should say I did *not* have problems with Suns to/from
1.2 systems.  We were using Suns as controls in some of our tests.  I
got my data mixed up.  The problems we had were specifically from V4
systems to 1.2 systems.

Michael J. Hammel        | mjhammel@{Kepler|socrates}.dell.com
Dell Computer Corp.      | {73377.3467|76424.3024}@compuserve.com
#include <disclaim/std>  | zzham@ttuvm1.bitnet | uunet!uudell!feynman!mjhammel
"oh oh, kwyjeebo on the loose!"