Path: utzoo!attcan!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!virtech!cpcahil
From: cpcahil@virtech.uucp (Conor P. Cahill)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: SCO 'date'
Message-ID: <1990Nov22.130335.624@virtech.uucp>
Date: 22 Nov 90 13:03:35 GMT
References: <2@mport.COM> <931@iiasa.UUCP> <1990Nov07.014539.10187@scuzzy.in-berlin.de> <1990Nov8.001536.10818@dell.dell.com> <7@mport.COM> <273C18CA.266B@telly.on.ca> <893@stewart.UUCP>
Reply-To: cpcahil@virtech.UUCP (Conor P. Cahill)
Organization: Virtual Technologies Inc., Sterling VA
Lines: 13

In article <893@stewart.UUCP> jerry@stewart.UUCP (Jerry Shekhel) writes:
>The weird thing is that entering "date `setclock`" from the command line
>actually advances the CMOS clock by 5 hours, every time.  Anyone out there
>have problems like these?  Any solutions?

Sounds like a timezone problem (especially since you are in the EST5EDT 
timezone which is 5 hours behind GMT.


-- 
Conor P. Cahill            (703)430-9247        Virtual Technologies, Inc.,
uunet!virtech!cpcahil                           46030 Manekin Plaza, Suite 160
                                                Sterling, VA 22170