Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!rutgers!rochester!kodak!gizzmo!mark From: mark@gizzmo.UUCP (mark hilliard) Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386 Subject: Re: TCP/NFS Message-ID: <110@gizzmo.UUCP> Date: 24 Nov 90 16:39:43 GMT References: <532@comcon.UUCP> <50@mailgzrz.tu-berlin.de> <109@gizzmo.UUCP> <1990Nov24.041255.24657@jadpc.cts.com> Reply-To: mark@gizzmo.UUCP (mark hilliard) Organization: gizzmo, Walworth, NY Lines: 32 In article <1990Nov24.041255.24657@jadpc.cts.com> jdeitch@jadpc.cts.com (Jim Deitch) writes: > >Boy, I whish people would think about what they write before typing. > >If you are NOT using a nameserver, you MUST have an entry defining >your domain. The second line in the file resolv.conf will be >nonameserver. > >Don't believe me? Ask any sysadm that has both SYSV and BSD systems >under them and you will see. Still don't believe me? Turn to the >manual page resolver(5) and read up friend. Lighten up! If you read the man for resolver(5) you will see that you DO NOT have to put in a domain. It will default out to the root. Even in a large networked environment, this will work. I am not a expert on network administration, but the entry that I recommended in the previous posting was derived at by spending several hours on the phone with Interactive's network guru's, and more importantly, it works (for me at least!). Setting up my little network here at kodak was not the easiest thing that I have done, and when tied into kodak's VERY LARGE backbone, I ran into lots of problems and the whole thing became a muddied nightmare. I envy your savvy on administrating your network, but not all of us are at that level yet. Constructive critisism is fine here, and we ALL can benifit from the input, but negitive critisism tends to turn people off, even if you are right. -- ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ | Mark Hilliard, N2HHR | AWK is not just a | | Fax 315-986-5882 | LANGUAGE | | mark@gizzmo.kodak.com | It is a way of LIFE! |