Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!ucsd!dog.ee.lbl.gov!lbl.gov!ctday
From: ctday@lbl.gov (Christopher T. Day)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.motif
Subject: Re: mwmDecorations
Message-ID: <1990Nov18.095526@lbl.gov>
Date: 18 Nov 90 17:55:26 GMT
References: <110630024@hpcvlx.cv.hp.com> <881@kivax.UUCP>
Sender: usenet@dog.ee.lbl.gov
Reply-To: ctday@lbl.gov (Christopher T. Day)
Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Lab, ICSD/AdvDev
Lines: 12
X-Local-Date: Sun, 18 Nov 90 10:01:59 PST

H'mm.  My Motif (ICS version 1.0.3) seems to have the opposite parity on the
decoration bits from yours.  The example you give has only the resize handles
REMOVED.  If I use MWM_DECOR_ALL, all the decorations are ADDED, not removed
as the Programmer's Guide suggests.  If I use

MWM_DECOR_RESIZEH | MWM_DECOR_MENU | MWM_DECOR_MINIMIZE | 
MWM_DECOR_MAXIMIZE | MWM_DECOR_TITLE

then I get ONLY the border.  Is there a definitive statement somewhere as to
which parity is correct?

Chris