Xref: utzoo sci.bio:3916 alt.romance:5456 soc.men:23767 soc.women:29921 soc.singles:73514 Path: utzoo!utgpu!cs.utexas.edu!turpin From: turpin@cs.utexas.edu (Russell Turpin) Newsgroups: sci.bio,alt.romance,soc.men,soc.women,soc.singles Subject: Re: Are Humans Naturally Monogamous? Summary: I knew this kind of nonsense would pop up when this thread was started. Message-ID: <14842@cs.utexas.edu> Date: 19 Nov 90 03:08:58 GMT References: <58975@microsoft.UUCP> <1990Nov14.005513.28667@massey.ac.nz> <1990Nov15.141028.25126@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov> <1990Nov16.203058.7780@ariel.unm.edu> <1990Nov18.214939.268@eagle.lerc.nasa.gov> Followup-To: sci.bio Organization: U. Texas CS Dept., Austin, Texas Lines: 30 ------ In article <1990Nov16.203058.7780@ariel.unm.edu>, bevans@gauss.unm.edu (Mathemagician) writes... > For me, centuries of spontaneous monogamous behaviour is enough to > convince me that SOME of us ARE naturally monogamous and that > promiscuity, where it exists in SOME, is largely a culturally > imposed phenomenon. > > Apologies if this seems to simplistic to Netters at large. Not simplistic; rather, cleverly wrong. First, if the author is monogamous, it undoubtedly stems in part from cultural influences. It is foolish in the extreme for him to claim that he knows what his sexual behavior would be had he (miraculously) survived to adulthood on a desert island absent culture -- which means: absent language, absent religion, absent social mores, absent any stories of romance or sex, absent any examples of romance or sex. It is natural for humans to develop their individual behavior within a cultural context. Both monogamous behavior and polygamous behavior as we know them are reached in this fashion. To the extent that it makes sense to ask which of these is natural, one can only look at the variety of cultures that have existed. The answer is then: humans are biologically capable of cultures that are polygamous, cultures that are monogamous, and cultures that are both. (Actually, the question of what sexual behavior a culture sanctions is too complex to be summarized so simply.) Russell