Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!julius.cs.uiuc.edu!rpi!bu.edu!att!cbnews!cbnews!military From: Steve.Bridges@Dayton.NCR.COM (Steve Bridges) Newsgroups: sci.military Subject: Re: seawolf submarine Message-ID: <1990Nov20.022252.27746@cbnews.att.com> Date: 20 Nov 90 02:22:52 GMT References: <1990Nov15.015554.4482@cbnews.att.com> <1990Nov16.054614.24287@cbnews.att.com> <1990Nov17.020233.29926@cbnews.att.com> Sender: military@cbnews.att.com (William B. Thacker) Organization: AT&T Bell Laboratories Lines: 33 Approved: military@att.att.com From: Steve.Bridges@Dayton.NCR.COM (Steve Bridges) In <1990Nov17.020233.29926@cbnews.att.com> gunter@antlia.cc.uwa.OZ.AU (Gunter Ahrendt) writes: >From: gunter@antlia.cc.uwa.OZ.AU (Gunter Ahrendt) >deichman@cod.nosc.mil (Shane D. Deichman) writes: >>Hull numbering sequence is peculiar, as U.S.N. hull numbers are by regulation >>to be sequential, yet SS 21 dates to 1912! Anomaly apparently came about >>when "SSN-21" was applied as the project title, indicating "Sumarine for >>the 21st Century." Name is still unofficial, and hull number may be changed >>to SSN 774. >I believe the original General Dynamics Electric Boat SSN-575 Seawolf is still >in service? (This being the rival to the Nautilus in testing nuclear propulsion) >If so, this presents another anomaly, and dictates a renaming of the original. >But I believe it is more likely to be decommisioned if not already.... I believe you are right. The Seawolf (SSN 575) was originally fitted with a liquid-sodium cooled reactor. For one reason or another, it was replaced with a pressurized-water reactor. I believe it was decommissioned sometime in the 1980s. -- Steve Bridges | NCR - USG Product Marketing and Support OLS Steve.Bridges@Dayton.NCR.COM | Phone:(513)-445-4182 622-4182 (Voice Plus) ..!ncrlnk!usglnk!uspm650!steve | AOPA #916233 ..!uunet!ncrlnk!usglnk!uspm650!steve| PP-ASEL, AMEL (I want a P-38 type rating)