Xref: utzoo comp.bugs.sys5:1374 comp.unix.xenix.sco:909
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!romp!auschs!awdprime!greenber.austin.ibm.com!jfh
From: jfh@greenber.austin.ibm.com (John F. Haugh II)
Newsgroups: comp.bugs.sys5,comp.unix.xenix.sco
Subject: Re: SCCS bug with "NULL" deltas
Message-ID: <4399@awdprime.UUCP>
Date: 29 Nov 90 17:39:34 GMT
References: <18758@rpp386.cactus.org> <14601@smoke.brl.mil>
Sender: news@awdprime.UUCP
Followup-To: comp.unix.xenix.sco
Organization: Obfuscated Features "R" Us, LCC, Austin
Lines: 19

In article <14601@smoke.brl.mil> gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn) writes:
>In article <18758@rpp386.cactus.org> jfh@rpp386.cactus.org (John F. Haugh II) writes:
>>Can anyone tell me if this is in all System Vs, or just SCO Xenix.
>
>It's certainly not a bug in all System Vs, since the version that I maintain
>passed your test with no problem.  I recall making many bug fixes to SCCS
>sources, some of which may not have been picked up by all vendors.  Perhaps
>one of the bugs I fixed was the one you reported; I can't easily check.

I've since tried this on a number of other systems, plus received
quite a few replies from others and this seems to be limited to some
version of SCO Xenix.

The AIX/PS 2 SCCS passes the test as well.  Anyone else have this =fail=?
I'm tired of hearing that it works everywheres ;-)
-- 
John F. Haugh II       | This space intentionally |    MaBellNet: (512) 838-4330
SneakerNet: 809/1C079  |      left blank ...      |      VNET: LCCB386 at AUSVMQ
BangNet: ...!cs.utexas.edu!ibmchs!auschs!snowball.austin.ibm.com!jfh (e-i-e-i-o)