Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!udel!princeton!cs!samadams!tr
From: tr@samadams.princeton.edu (Tom Reingold)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: question on opendir, readdir, etc.
Message-ID: <4776@rossignol.Princeton.EDU>
Date: 29 Nov 90 22:01:35 GMT
References: <4767@rossignol.Princeton.EDU> <14611@smoke.brl.mil>
Sender: news@cs.Princeton.EDU
Organization: Noo Joizy -- The Cultural Mecca
Lines: 49

In article <14611@smoke.brl.mil> gwyn@smoke.brl.mil (Doug Gwyn)
writes:

$ In article <4767@rossignol.Princeton.EDU> tr@samadams.princeton.edu
$ (Tom Reingold) writes:
$ >To use opendir, readdir, etc. on BSD, you include <sys/dir.h>.  This
$ >lets you use a struct defined as direct.  The member d_name is a
$ >character array of size MAXNAMLEN+1 (256).
$ 
$ That is obsolete.

Which is obsolete?  <sys/ndir.h>?

$ >To use these functions on System V, you include <dirent.h>.  This lets
$ >you use a struct defined as dirent.  Confusingly close.  The member
$ >d_name is a character array of size 1!  Is this for real?  I have a
$ >sample program which works, but I think I'm lucky that trashing the
$ >area after my structure doesn't kill anything vital.
$ 
$ UNIX System (as of release 3.0) included IEEE Std 1003.1 (POSIX)-
$ compatible directory access functions and the corresponding header.
$ The code actually originated with my independent implementation;
$ Kirk McKusick of UCB had earlier provided an implementation of the
$ BSD "struct direct" flavor of these functions, which inspired the
$ POSIX specification.  There were good reasons for the slight changes
$ made by IEEE P1003, which I won't go into here.
$ 
$ >Am I not supposed to use these functions in System V?  If I am, do they
$ >normally work?
$ 
$ Yes, they had BETTER work.  The [1] kludge is deliberate, and from
$ time to time argument rages about whether the C standard requires that
$ an implementation make it work or whether it could ever fail.  I have
$ yet to hear of any commercial UNIX implementation where it doesn't
$ work.

How can it work?  And why was this kludge put there?

$ You can also obtain my current implementation simply by requesting it
$ in an e-mail message to me <Gwyn@BRL.MIL>.

I have it already, thank you.  Now I know I should use it.

Is this POSIX standard found in System V Release 4?
--
        Tom Reingold
        tr@samadams.princeton.edu  OR  ...!princeton!samadams!tr
        "Warning: Do not drive with Auto-Shade in place.  Remove
        from windshield before starting ignition."