Xref: utzoo comp.lang.fortran:4223 comp.lang.c:34399
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!udel!haven!adm!cmcl2!kramden.acf.nyu.edu!brnstnd
From: brnstnd@kramden.acf.nyu.edu (Dan Bernstein)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.fortran,comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Fortran vs. C for numerical work (SUMMARY)
Message-ID: <13943:Nov3016:28:5190@kramden.acf.nyu.edu>
Date: 30 Nov 90 16:28:51 GMT
References: <2392:Nov2902:59:0590@kramden.acf.nyu.edu> <7339@lanl.gov> <1990Nov30.145649.17688@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Organization: IR
Lines: 9

In article <1990Nov30.145649.17688@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> mcdonald@aries.scs.uiuc.edu (Doug McDonald) writes:
> I don't know what kind of Compaq or Zenith you are using, but 
> on a 25 or 33 MHz 386 or 486 machine with a 3167 or 4167 floating
> point unit the memory latency and FPU multiplication time are
> roughly equal.

We are not talking about floating point.

---Dan