Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!purdue!mentor.cc.purdue.edu!garlange
From: garlange@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Mark Garlanger)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.pascal
Subject: Re: TP 6.0
Message-ID: <1760@mentor.cc.purdue.edu>
Date: 25 Nov 90 23:11:27 GMT
References: <11514@j.cc.purdue.edu> <7302@hub.ucsb.edu> <1990Nov23.155706.814@sun1.ruf.uni-freiburg.de> <1721@umriscc.isc.umr.edu>
Reply-To: garlange@mentor.cc.purdue.edu (Mark Garlanger)
Organization: Purdue University
Lines: 11

In article <1721@umriscc.isc.umr.edu> mcastle@mcs213a.cs.umr.edu (Mike Castle) writes:
>
>Btw, Pascal is a good pre-production langauge.  Get it done with Pascal first
>so it works, then port/encrypt to/with C to tweak that extra 0.2% effeciency
>out of the code.  :->

Why mess with C, Jump straight to assembler for the critical routines.
you can cut execution times down 50% or more.  Pascal/Asm combo works great
for me.

					Mark