Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!lavaca.uh.edu!menudo.uh.edu!nuchat!sugar!ficc!peter From: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk Subject: Re: Lotus Marketplace Message-ID: Date: 30 Nov 90 18:17:09 GMT References: <5010@rsiatl.UUCP> <1990Nov20.181212.28545@looking.on.ca> <5020@rsiatl.UUCP> <61182@bbn.BBN.COM> <5157@rsiatl.Dixie.Com> Reply-To: peter@ficc.ferranti.com (Peter da Silva) Organization: Xenix Support, FICC Lines: 15 In article <5157@rsiatl.Dixie.Com> jgd@Dixie.Com (John G. DeArmond) writes: > First off, I didn't say I liked the way the law works, I was simplying > stating that it DOES work that way now. You DO indeed have to prove > your inncence once you blow the box and fail. I'm sorry, John, but I'm going to have to blather some more. Your whole RICO-style database proposal, and the fact that you brought up drunk driving and breathalysers to support it, does rather strongly imply that you like the way the law works. And of course... > Which really has nothing > to do with the discussion of the use of databases against us. So why did you bring it up? Or do you have an Evil Twin? Which John DeArmond are we to believe? -- Peter da Silva. `-_-' +1 713 274 5180. 'U` peter@ferranti.com