Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!bionet!hayes.ims.alaska.edu!floyd From: floyd@hayes.ims.alaska.edu (Floyd Davidson) Newsgroups: comp.os.cpm Subject: Re: Kaypro ROMs Message-ID: <1990Nov26.063251.6554@hayes.ims.alaska.edu> Date: 26 Nov 90 06:32:51 GMT References: <1990Nov22.030504.6649@simasd.uucp> <1990Nov22.110949.12852@hayes.ims.alaska.edu> <28387@usc> Organization: University of Alaska Fairbanks Lines: 31 In article <28387@usc> mlinar@eve.usc.edu (Mitch Mlinar) writes: >In article <1990Nov22.110949.12852@hayes.ims.alaska.edu> floyd@hayes.ims.alaska.edu (Floyd Davidson) writes: >>In article <1990Nov22.030504.6649@simasd.uucp> donm@pnet07.cts.com (Don Maslin) writes: >>> In order to use QD drives you need to make changes to both ROM and >>> BIOS. There are/were a couple of outfits that had slightly >>> differing versions: Advent's TurboROM and Micro Cornucopia's MAX >>> ROM. >> >>I installed a TurboROM on a K-10, and once had a copy of the first >>ROM that Micro C sold. I don't recall that the BIOS needed to be >>changed with either of them. Mind you I could be wrong on that, >>but if I remember right all the code that handles disk blocking and >>so on is in the ROM, all the BIOS does is call the ROM. On most >>earlier CP/M systems that code was actually in the BIOS itself. > >Floyd is part right: all blocking/deblocking of of disk sectors is done >in the ROM itself. And, although you can use the original BIOS with two >of them (not KayPLUS - the third), why would you want to? The original >Kaypro BIOS is pretty poor and makes some bad assumptions. See below. Hey, what I said was that to use QD disks you don't *have* to change the BIOS. Thats is totally true, (I think). As to why would one want to use the original BIOS: only if you can't get or program a new one. I'll go along on that. Floyd -- Floyd L. Davidson floyd@hayes.ims.alaska.edu Salcha, AK 99714 paycheck connection to Alascom, Inc. When I speak for them, one of us will be *out* of business in a hurry.