Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rpi!bu.edu!att!pacbell.com!pacbell!premenos!mtdiablo!rob
From: rob@mtdiablo.Concord.CA.US (Rob Boldbear)
Newsgroups: comp.sources.bugs
Subject: Re: RN/RRN patch 50
Message-ID: <1990Nov27.164909.18124@mtdiablo.Concord.CA.US>
Date: 27 Nov 90 16:49:09 GMT
References: <4354@lib.tmc.edu> <47439@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU>
Organization: Mt. Diablo Software Solutions
Lines: 14

In article <47439@eerie.acsu.Buffalo.EDU> pjg@acsu.buffalo.edu (Paul Graham) writes:
>patch 50 failed on ndir.c.  fetching kit9 reveals the progression
>1.3 -> 1.5 -> 1.6.  my ndir.c (patchlevel 48,49) was at 1.3 and
>patch 50 wanted 1.5.

I had the same problem.  Applying the patch anyway caused only the new
rcs comment to be rejected.  I have found with the last few rn/rrn
patches that I always get a small number of rejects, always because the
context of the new rcs comment doesn't fit the old version.
-- 
Rob Bernardo                             Mt. Diablo Software Solutions    _ /
email: rob@mtdiablo.Concord.CA.US        phone: (415) 827-4301           <_/_><
"Putting dogma ahead of people is the antithesis of compassion.  But      /
that's exactly what many avowed Christians who profess `compassion' do." -Me