Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!umich!vela!dlcogswe
From: dlcogswe@vela.acs.oakland.edu (Dan Cogswell)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Word Processors
Message-ID: <4035@vela.acs.oakland.edu>
Date: 28 Nov 90 05:28:23 GMT
References: <4032@vela.acs.oakland.edu> <11903@hubcap.clemson.edu>
Reply-To: dlcogswe@vela.acs.oakland.edu (Dan Cogswell)
Distribution: na
Organization: Oakland University, Rochester MI
Lines: 26

In article <11903@hubcap.clemson.edu> ddyer@hubcap.clemson.edu (Doug) writes:
>
>Micro-Systems has a great wordprocessor, though.  There were loads of features.
>Id like to see this thread grow.  Are there any good PD or shareware ones?

Okay, has anybody used the new Wordperfect which is supposed to be 
2.0-compatible?  I'm concerned almost exclusively with text output, except 
for the inclusion of perhaps some tables or graphs.  Will WordPerfect do
these things??  

Another area I seldom see addressed in magazines is the quality of output
for a modest printer (not all of us can afford a postscript device).  I have 
a 24-pin Toshiba-compatible Citizen printer and I certainly don't want to 
send a 30-page term project to it as an IFF graphics dump!  I did that once.
(ONCE! :-).  Does excellence 2.0 utilize preference printers well?  

What's the latest version of WordPerfect?  Transcript?

>---------------------------------//-------------------------------------
>Doug Dyer  Clemson University   //      "Splunge!"  -  MP 
>ddyer@hubcap.clemson.edu    \\ //          
>-----------------------------\X/----------------------------------------


-- 
Dan