Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!usc!apple!uokmax!cbdougla
From: cbdougla@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu (Collin Broad Douglas)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga
Subject: Re: Sorry Guys, There is NO WAY!
Keywords: AMIGA 3000 vs NEXT
Message-ID: <1990Nov30.021537.1042@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu>
Date: 30 Nov 90 02:15:37 GMT
References: <16321@brahms.udel.edu>
Sender: cbdougla@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu
Organization: Engineering Computer Network, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK
Lines: 26

In article <16321@brahms.udel.edu> scream@brahms.udel.edu (Darren Amato) writes:
>I know that this topic has been hacked over and over again, And I'm not
>one to "beat a dead horse" but,  There is NO WAY that the Amiga 3000 is
>a better or more flexible computer than the Next.
>
>I just came from a Next presentation on campus and WOW!
>
>The only thing that the Amiga 3000 has over the new Next system is
>color.                
>
>
>						scream


  take a look at the Amiga 3000 ux.  A magazine article said it came with 8
megs of RAM, a 100 meg HD, Unix (real unix like the NeXT) a 25 Mhz 68030,
two C compilers and other stuff (I think a mono monitor) for $4000.  

  The NeXT and the Amiga are definetly the top two in price performance.


-- 
  Collin Douglas                  |  "We demand rigidly defined areas of doubt  
                                  |   and uncertainty."          
  cbdougla@uokmax.ecn.uoknor.edu  |      
  America Online:  CollinD        |   -Douglas Adams from Hitchhiker's Guide