Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!samsung!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!caen!uflorida!haven!decuac!pa.dec.com!bacchus!mwm From: mwm@raven.relay.pa.dec.com (Mike (My Watch Has Windows) Meyer) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.tech Subject: Re: Pipe syntax... I think I'd better think it out again... Message-ID: Date: 30 Nov 90 17:02:09 GMT References: <1990Nov18.090654.24747@agate.berkeley.edu> <1990Nov19.031449.25071@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <1990Nov24.073600.10802@agate.berkeley.edu> <36371@cup.portal.com> Sender: news@pa.dec.com (News) Distribution: na Organization: Missionaria Phonibalonica Lines: 17 In-Reply-To: FelineGrace@cup.portal.com's message of 30 Nov 90 06:58:34 GMT In article <36371@cup.portal.com> FelineGrace@cup.portal.com (Dana B Bourgeois) writes: Pete G. says he uses ARP and has no problems. I also use ARP without problems. Something I have seen in the posts of those who have problems with ARP is that they use the ARP shell. I don't. I use WShell. I wonder if other people who also have no problems with ARP do without the ARP shell. Maybe that is where the problem is. Not the library or the commands, the shell. Pete? No, I'm not Pete. But I had problems with ARP (pre 1.3) without the ARP shell. The problems were supposedly fixed in 1.3, but by then I had a hard disk. Wasn't worth installing.