Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!mcdchg!ddsw1!zane
From: zane@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Sameer Parekh)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Re: Some observations
Message-ID: <1990Nov25.215256.13506@ddsw1.MCS.COM>
Date: 25 Nov 90 21:52:56 GMT
References: <9010310002.AA02158@apple.com>
Reply-To: zane@ddsw1.MCS.COM (Sameer Parekh)
Organization: ddsw1.MCS.COM Contributor, Wheeling, IL
Lines: 24

In article <9010310002.AA02158@apple.com> MQUINN%UTCVM@PUCC.PRINCETON.EDU writes:
>0
> @UCSD.EDU>
>
>On Mon, 29 Oct 90 20:33:34 GMT Desdinova said:
>>  They did WHAT?  Gave up? They COULDN'T have been trying very hard.
>>A //gs clone would be bloody simple to make, if they improved the design
>>while they were at it.  I imagine it's more like, "we don't want to spend
>>the resources when we can make 386 boxes".
>
>A couple of my friends that were at Applefest (I forgot which one) said they
>saw a WORKING LaserGS prototype.  I have no idea why they aren't marketing it
>though.
>
	Ever heard of copyright and/or patent laws? I don't even think
BUILDING a clone was legal, let alone marketing it! (Desigining would be legal
I think)


-- 
zane@ddsw1.MCS.COM