Path: utzoo!attcan!telly!lethe!yunexus!ists!helios.physics.utoronto.ca!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rutgers!tut.cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!ucdavis!yogi.ucdavis.edu!ccrovac
From: ccrovac@yogi.ucdavis.edu
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Programming Environment - Which to Get?
Message-ID: <9342@aggie.ucdavis.edu>
Date: 26 Nov 90 07:33:30 GMT
Sender: usenet@aggie.ucdavis.edu
Reply-To: pthirose@ucdavis.edu (Paul Hirose){
Lines: 31

I've been seriously (finally) th{inking abw3out getting a decent
programming environment for my GS, and I've decided on either TML
Pascal II or Orca/Pascal.  Basically, I was wondering which one is
better.  I guess the most apt question would be which is less buggy? 
[Kind of sad when that question is the one which determines product
choice].

I've also decided on getting Orca/C (used, cheap w/full dox) and would
like to know how seriously bug-ridden this system is.  We all know that
it has bugs, I want to know how bad it is.  I've heard of "i++" bugs
which would seem rather serious (although easly gotten around).

Are Orca/C bugs well documented by Byteworks (or user group
publications or something?)  I trust I'm not let alone to fend {off
bugs...(yes, I have the noteworthy people on the net...but that's
yet another problem :))

Thanks...in advance as always.
Oh...this topic has been hashed enough on the net...I think we could
all save bandwidth, if you just dropped your opinions/sugestions to
me via email.  

Paul Hirose
pthirose@ucdavis.edu
ccrovac@yogi.ucdavis.edu
+ others in sig

|-----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|  Internet   pthirose@ucdavis.edu     : USnail Mail      : "Violence is the  |
|  BITNET     pthirose@ucdavis         :   Paul Hirose    :  last refuge of   |
|  UUCP       ucdavis!pthirose         :   230 A St, #18  :  the incompetent" |