Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!att!oucsace!bchurch
From: bchurch@oucsace.cs.OHIOU.EDU (Bob Church)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2
Subject: Timeworks was PostScript to disk?
Message-ID: <2629@oucsace.cs.OHIOU.EDU>
Date: 28 Nov 90 04:07:25 GMT
References: <25989.chatter.infoapple@pro-beagle> <14240@crdgw1.crd.ge.com>
Organization: Ohio University CS Dept., Athens
Lines: 9

In article <25989.chatter.infoapple@pro-beagle>, warren.e@pro-beagle (Warren Ernst) writes:

>Anyone had any better luck, or is TimeWorks lying to us again?

Lying again? I've found TimeWorks to actually understate the performance
of their software. This statement really takes me by surprise. 

Bob Church
bchurch.oucsace.cs.ohiou.edu