Path: utzoo!utgpu!watserv1!watmath!att!linac!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!unsvax!uns-helios!alfter From: alfter@uns-helios.nevada.edu (SCOTT ALFTER) Newsgroups: comp.sys.apple2 Subject: Re: AE... Message-ID: <2384@unsvax.NEVADA.EDU> Date: 29 Nov 90 09:58:04 GMT References: <9011240330.AA29157@apple.com> <54240023@hpindwa.cup.hp.com> Sender: news@unsvax.NEVADA.EDU Organization: University of Nevada System Computing Services Lines: 27 In article <54240023@hpindwa.cup.hp.com> tribby@hpindwa.cup.hp.com (David Tribby) writes: >PYC121@URIACC.URI.EDU (Andy Kress) wrote: >> ... On page 9 there in an Applied Engineering ad for accelerator boards. >> Ok....the first paragraph reads as follows, "A blank sheet of engineering >> paper. For some time now, we've done all of our design work using CAD >> (computer aided design), but the blank sheet of paper shown above represents >> future AE peripherals and accessories for the Apple II line." I found this >> paragraph to be very concerning. Does this mean they are no longer going >> to make new products for the Apple II? >My interpretation: they're going to be making new products that will >depend upon features designed into the TransWarp GS. If you buy someone >else's (e.g. Zip), you won't be able to take advantage of the neat new >stuff that will be coming out. They really stressed "future compatibility." I just picked up a copy of InCider today (probably the only time I'll ever buy it; I just wanted to see firsthand what everyone was talking about :-) ). I think all that AE is guilty of is being a bit ambiguous in their ad, since you can interpret what they said in two completely opposite ways. (Let's just hope that's all there is to it.) ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- Scott Alfter _/_ / v \ Apple II: Internet: alfter@uns-helios.nevada.edu ( ( the power to be your best! GEnie: S.ALFTER \_^_/